Sexual violence in the home in Japan
- To show that the care of a victimized child becomes difficult or even impossible when the parent/guardian is uncooperative.
- To show that when no organization takes responsibility for the care of a victimized child and the parent/guardian behaves in an unethical manner, the situation becomes unremediable.
The victim is an 11 year-old girl with 4 older and 2 younger brothers of which the eldest was 16 years old. She was taken to the emergency department by ambulance due to severe abdominal pain and was found to be 30 weeks pregnant. It was suspected that one of the elder brothers had impregnated her, but the details were unclear. 
The parent refused an interview visit by the child consultation and protection centre and missed an opportunity for the girl to have help from agencies. 
When the girl was admitted to the paediatric department after delivery  her mother came and took her away without permission, and afterwards, returned to take the baby. The mother then moved out of her home without notice. Care for the victimized child could not be provided. 
 In cases of sexual abuse by a family member, it is difficult to clarify the details.
 The mother refused intervention by a public institution, and the responsible staff did not intervene because the mother insisted, “the girl is the baby’s mother, let her bring it up”
 Comprehensive teamwork by responsible sectors is important such as the departments of paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology and psychiatry, with expert government or NGO sector teams.
 The horizontal cooperation in  is difficult because of the vertical administration system, which prevents sharing of information.
- It is thought that there was domestic abuse.
- As there is no law in Japan requiring the reporting of the girl’s pregnancy to responsible sectors/organizations, the intention of the family is given priority over the care of the victimized child.
- Communication between the child consultation centres in different local governments does not occur because of independent management by the separate local governments. Therefore when a family moves to another city, follow up is virtually impossible.
As it is so difficult for victims of sexual abuse by a family member to report the crime, the full extent of these crimes is unknown.
- Record keeping of child abuse consultations began in 1990 in Japan. Consultations have increased over the years with 1,101 consultations in 1990, 11,631 in 1999, 37,323 in 2008 and 59,862 in 2011.
- Abuse by type in Japan (1999): Records of consultations and notifications of abuse provided by the child consultation centre.
1) Physical abuse constituted 53% of the child abuse consultations/notifications. The assault records showed:
- Contusions and bruises in 69.9%
- Burns in 13.4%
- Head trauma in 12.1%
- Fractures in 5.5%
- Stings in 2.7%
2) Negligence or refusal of protection (neglect) constituted 32% of the child abuse consultations/notifications. Neglect records showed
- Negligence in 60%
- Deserted child/left behind in 35%
- School ban in 4%
3) Psychological abuse constituted 9% of the child abuse consultations/notifications. This showed an increase by about 2.5 fold compared to other types of abuse. In most cases, psychological abuse overlapped with other types of abuse.
4) Sexual abuse constituted 6% of the child abuse consultation/notification. Around
6% of sexual abuse cases led to pregnancy
- Age Composition of abuse cases (2006). Total number 37,323 (100%)
- Type of abuse cases (2006)
In cases of child abuse, the parent/guardian generally does not give a detailed account of the abuse, so it is impossible to assess the situation fully.
An urgent task is the construction of a comprehensive network between the different agencies involved including police, medical departments such as paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology and psychiatry, and expert government teams to work as “The One Stop Centre” providing physical and mental support to child abuse victims.